A letter to Senators

I suggest for your reading, when you have the time this very personal and well thought out letter to Australian Senators on the topic of Euthanasia

Written by Nicholas Tonti-Filippini, an eminent Melbourne bio-ethicist, and addressed to the the Memebrs of the Senate, who are discussing the possibility of legalizing Euthanasia in the Territories.

Prof. Tonti-Filippini does not write in the name of any of the committees, Hospitals or Universities he is involved with, but writes as a terminally Ill man, who knows acute suffering, pain, and the fear presented to all like him who meet the requirements of the proposed legislation.

Relevant to this matter is the fact that I am dealing with my own terminal illness (combination of renal failure, advanced ischaemic heart disease and Rheumatoid auto-immune disease) and am dependant on haemodialysis and palliative care.    I have undergone 15 angioplasty procedures and the placement of eight stents to attempt to recover some blood flow after the failure of coronary bypass surgery.  The last such procedure was unsuccessful as the blocked artery could not be accessed.  The Rheumatoid disease causes chronic pleuropericarditis.  I mention these matters only to establish that I am no stranger to suffering and disability, and am well aware of the limitations of palliative care.  It is particularly difficult to control chronic pain because the effectiveness of most forms of pain relief is of limited duration, given the development of therapeutic tolerance.  I have reached the limits of what palliative care can offer.
I cannot speak for all people who suffer from illness and disability, but think I can speak more credibly about suffering, illness and disability than those people who advocate for euthanasia presenting an ideological view of suffering and disability.  Facing illness and disability takes courage and we do not need those euthanasia advocates to tell us that we are so lacking dignity and have such a poor quality of life that our lives are not worth living.

….

That desire to live is often tenuous in the face of suffering and in the face of the burden our illnesses impose on others, our families and the wider community.   You would gain nothing worthwhile for us by supporting the legalisation of deliberately ending the life of those who request death.  Such requests warrant a response in solidarity from our community, a response that seeks to give us more support and better care, rather than termination of both life and care.

Read the full piece on the CAM website here

“Respect, protect, love and serve life every human person.” 

I re-post here in full the Archbishop’s Homily from the vigil for Nascant Human Life last weekend. I give the full text, because it is a lovely piece on the beauty of life, given us by God, and something that is worthy material for prayer and reflection by all of us.
I suggest you print it out and read it a few times, especially as we Victorians prepare to vote in the coming weeks.

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

“What is man that you keep him in mind?”  (Psalm 8:5) As human beings we always reflected on the purpose of our own existence.  From the time of Adam the whole of humanity waited for Christ the Redeemer; the full revelation of the love of the Father.
Today and in two weeks’ time in other places in the world the cry will go up to God the Father welcoming Christ who took our human nature, showing that God said a great yes to human life.
“For by his Incarnation the Son of God has united himself in some fashion with every human being … born of the Virgin Mary he has truly been made one of us.”  (Gaudium et Spes, 22)
Today the Church feels in duty bound to speak out with courage on behalf of those who have no voice, to reaffirm in a vigorous way the value of human life and the fact that it is inviolable.  At the same time, we make a pressing appeal to each and every person in the name of God: “Respect, protect, love and serve life every human person.”  (Evangelium Vitae, 5)
The great gift of God to our world is that each of us is different and unique.  One thought which I treasure is that God loves each of us as if we were the only person in the world.
“To defend and promote life, to show reverence and love for it, is a task which God entrusts to every human being.”  (Evangelium Vitae, 42)  So it is a right and duty that belongs to everyone.  We, who have gathered to pray, have to try to convince other members of our society of this sacredness, because life belongs to God. 

The family as the sanctuary of life has an irreplaceable role in this task and this right and duty belongs to families.  We urge parents to educate their children, to welcome a new baby into the world, to respect frail, older people, to build a culture of love and welcome, which will embrace all humanity.

At times this might seem a huge task.  However, if we look at the witness to life around the world we cannot but be struck by the strength of the Pro-life Movement in America, for example. 
Each of us has a task summed up:
1.    By living and celebrating the Gospel of life;
2.    By rejoicing in God, the Author of life, and in our own life to pray, to participate in the liturgy and the Sacraments.

But above all it is most important that each of us carry out in our own daily life the celebration of the Gospel of life.  There is a spirit of charity towards everyone also by our own self-giving.  Are we here for our self, or are we here for others?  We have to actively show care for all life and for the life of everyone and by doing this we have to promote a culture of life, where “the people of life” with their vast and diverse associations and groups are called to fulfil unique and irreplaceable service for life within society.

The challenge which we have is stronger than a solely political activity.  It is something which comes from our nature and conviction, something which we can do by affirming the dignity of each person.  It may be the way we treat a beggar on the street.  It may be the way we treat children, even when they are naughty.  It may be the respect and love and reassurance we show to older people.  This brings an irreplaceable service for life within our society, notwithstanding laws which promote the opposite. 

By love and respect and hard work, we in Victoria have a huge challenge, to come from a culture of death to a culture of life.  If each of us shows love and respect of live, particularly in its weakest forms, then our dignity as a State and Nation will be enhanced and we will be fulfilling the mission which God gave to each of us.

Thank you for participating in this Prayer Vigil for all nascent human life.  It is meant to be a cry of all humanity, rising up to God the Father, the giver of all good things, in order that every human life is respected, protected and loved.  Saint Irenaeus said:  “The glory of God is humanity fully alive.”

+ Denis J. Hart,
ARCHBISHOP OF MELBOURNE.

Victorian Bishops speak out before the State Election

A PDF of the Victorian Bishops statement can be found here

A series of questions for your local member can be found here

Brown has His back up, and claws out.

The Euthanasia debate seems to have steped up a notch in the last few days in Melbourne with Bob Brown going head to head with the Archbishop of Melbourne Denis Hart.
David Shultz has a good piece on it at his blog, it can be viewed here

I draw your attention to my earlier post on the release of Archbishop Hart’s pastoral statement.

Also this post.

Archbishop Hart: Statement on Euthanasia

Our Archbishop + Denis Hart, Archbishop of Melbourne, this week released his official statement of Euthanasia which should be mandatory reading in every Catholic Home, School, University, Office, etc. Print it out, and pass it around your friends and work mates.

As Catholics we have a responsibility to form our Conscience in areas of Faith and Morals, and therefore a responsibility to be aware of the Church’s stances on areas of the Moral Life. As importantly we have a responsibility to the world in which we live to stand up for the dignity of human life, from conception to natural end.

The PDF can be downloaded here, print it out and hand it out.

His Video message can be viewed here.

Read the entire text, it is worth it, Victorians who are preparing to go to the polls this November should pay particular attention to his final paragraph

If there is a vote on euthanasia in the next term of the state Parliament, as predicted, each member will most likely be given a conscience vote. As you consider which candidate to vote for, ask them what their position is on euthanasia and assisted suicide.

We should all know where our individual member of parliament (not their party) stands on this issue before we cast our vote this November. Please take the time and read the full text, and then take the time over the next month to find out where you local member of parliament stands on this very important issue for all of us, because as the Archbishop says in his video message, a society is judged on how it treats its oldest, most frail, and most vulnerable members.

There is a renewed push in Victoria and many other parts of Australia for euthanasia and assisted suicide to be legalised. Misplaced compassion leads some to call for euthanasia. While it is never easy facing the end of life of a loved one, we cannot support the legalisation of euthanasia however it is described.

Euthanasia and assisted suicide are the opposite of care and represent the abandonment of older and dying persons. Instead, we encourage all people of goodwill, to respond to this new challenge with truth and compassion. I join the Anglican Church of Australia in affirming that our task is to protect, nurture and sustain life to the best of our ability.

Advocates of euthanasia and assisted suicide are mounting a new campaign for far-reaching change to Victoria’s laws on euthanasia and assisted suicide. If the State government were to ask the Law Reform Commission to review the Medical Treatment Act, there is a serious danger that the Commission would follow previous practice in relation to laws such as abortion and after a brief period of public consultation recommend radical change to the legislation without consultation on the proposed changes.   With these laws there was little time or opportunity for public consultation, debate or reflection and the laws were introduced to the Parliament by the Government on the basis that it would not allow amendments.

Since the Northern Territory’s brief experiment with euthanasia in 1996, euthanasia advocates have introduced numerous bills into state parliaments around Australia all of which have been rejected. Why? Because when parliamentarians take the time to debate the issue fully and to consider all the consequences properly they realise that to decriminalise euthanasia and assisted suicide would threaten the lives of other vulnerable people.

The proposals if enacted would allow some people to be treated differently under the law such that their lives could be taken at their request.  The impact of a law of that kind on those people who fit the description is to make them vulnerable particularly if they feel that they are a burden to others.

The experience of the Netherlands confirms just how far such a mentality can spread with pressure to increase the scope of the law so that it includes not just those with terminal illness and unrelievable suffering, but also people who suffer from depression, those who cannot make their own decisions, and even children.

As Pope Benedict reminded us recently, “the Church has always had great respect for the elderly” and the dying and this has been expressed practically in Catholic health and aged care, especially in hospice services.

As medical advances increasingly lead to a longer life for many people, we should view older people as a blessing for society rather than a problem. Each generation has much to teach the generation that follows it. We should therefore see care of the elderly as repayment of a debt of gratitude, as a part of a culture of love and care.

The Catholic community already does much to care through our network of hospices, hospitals and other services. I call on the Catholic community and people of good will to continue to care for the frail elderly, the sick and the dying, at every stage of life. I ask you to continue to journey with those who are sick and in pain, to visit them, and ensure they have appropriate care and support and pain management and most of all someone to remain close to them.

I thank those healthcare professionals and palliative care specialists, nurses, doctors and specialist, psychologists, pain management teams, pastoral carers, religious, volunteers and others who work every day to reduce psychological pain, social and spiritual suffering, in positive and life affirming ways.

It is an uplifting and inspiring experience to observe the love and care of those who work with and support the ill and the dying in their final days of life.   I encourage the community to do more to support those often unseen heroes who stand in solidarity and love those who are suffering. 

I ask the Parliament to put its energy and creative talents, into positive supports, rather than taking the negative path towards euthanasia or assisted suicide. I call on our parliaments to increase their support for aged care and palliative care programs.

I ask the community to continue to love and care for those who are sick and suffering rather than abandoning them to euthanasia or supporting them to suicide. Our ability to care says much about the strength of our society.

If there is a vote on euthanasia in the next term of the state Parliament, as predicted, each member will most likely be given a conscience vote. As you consider which candidate to vote for, ask them what their position is on euthanasia and assisted suicide.

Yours sincerely in Christ

ARCHBISHOP OF MELBOURNE

It eliminates the Sufferer

I have read two good articles in the last few days on the issue of euthanasia which has surfaced again. . Cardinal Pell calls it “Brown Death” while Bill Muehlenberg from MercatorNet.com speaks of the party of death that never sleeps. Either way the point is made, the current discussions that are occurring around the legalisation of Euthanasia are being pushed onto the agenda by a small but vocal minority.

Both authors suggest that the issue of Euthanasia is one which most Australians do not fully comprehend, and that those pushing the issue would have you believe that it is helping people to die with dignity, where really it is someone far from that.

Pell tells us :

“No Christian is opposed to dying with dignity.  The pro-life forces are totally opposed to prolonging unnecessary suffering.  Opponents of euthanasia support pain relief, keeping patients comfortable, even when as a by product death comes sooner.”

But

“Euthanasia is not a compassionate response to suffering, because it eliminates the sufferer and does not work alongside the patient to help medically and personally.”

For Pell

“Permission to kill those who do not want to continue would put pressure on those feeling useless and depressed that they are only a burden on others and have a duty to die.”

Muehlenberg puts it this way

“For all the talk about choice, about freedom to choose, about giving people options, the legal and social legitimisation for assisted suicide will effectively eliminate one option, namely, staying alive without having to justify one’s existence. With legalised euthanasia, the burden will be upon people to justify being alive – we will have to prove that we ought to be allowed to live.”

And points out that not only is pressure put on those who are sick, but also on healthcare professionals

The right to die implies a duty to kill….. We live in a rights-mad culture. Everyone is demanding a right for this or that. But there are no rights without corresponding duties. An officially sanctioned right must be backed up by the legally enforced means to ensure those rights can be carried out. Thus if society goes down the path of legalised euthanasia, this right to die will lead to its necessary corollary, the duty to kill.

He concludes with this word of warning

“In a culture where worth and value tends to be measured by the bottom line, the call for legalised euthanasia will likely also be assessed in those terms. Financial considerations will tend to trump other concerns, including the right to life. All the more reason to never allow euthanasia to be legalized.”

It is important that we are all well aware of the reality of what our politicians are really talking about when the speak of Euthanasia.

Both articles are worth reading

The full Pell article can be found here

The full Muehlenberg article can be found here

“We do not kill each other”.

Paul Kelly, editor-at-large of The Australian newspaper, has an interesting piece today on the background and possible future consequences of the Euthanasia debate currently doing the rounds of Australian politics (again).

Here are some of the highlights, with my comments.

NEW Prime Minister Julia Gillard will be called on to reveal more of her core beliefs, with the immediate test being the euthanasia bill that highlights a cultural divide in Western society. Greens leader Bob Brown’s decision to introduce a private member’s bill to restore the power of parliaments in the Northern Territory and the ACT to legislate for euthanasia poses a political challenge for the minority Labor government and for Gillard.

He then goes on to tell us at in recent history, apart from in a few isolated nations (Belgium, The Netherlands and two states in the USA) Euthanasia is not accepted in Western countries. He then quotes Margaret Somerville, a lawer and ethisist:

“If you look at the most fundamental norm or value on which our type of societies are based, it is that we do not kill each other. No matter how compassionate and merciful your reasons for carrying out euthanasia, it still alters that norm that we do not kill each other to one where we do not usually, but in some cases we do.”

Kelly points out that most Australians do not actually grasp what is being proposed.

The entire key to the euthanasia debate lies in its great paradox: consistent polls showing a majority in favour. But what, exactly, are people supporting? The 1996-97 debate provides the answer: most people think that turning off life-support machines and discontinuing life-preserving treatment is euthanasia. In fact, this is nothing to do with euthanasia. Indeed, it is the precise opposite of euthanasia. If a family turns off a life-support machine, the patient dies because of their illness, not because of the doctor. But if the doctor gives a lethal injection, then the patient is killed. This is a fine yet critical distinction.

Once a society sanctions the killing some of it’s members, where does it stop.

Because euthanasia involves one person being sanctioned to kill another, it cannot be seen just within a human rights framework. It is an ethical and intellectual failure to pretend that euthanasia is merely a human right awaiting recognition. It is about society and its norms and values. There is no escaping the chasm that euthanasia crosses. Creation of a legal framework to permit killing must affect the way all people perceive their lives and the expectations that friends, family and doctors have of patients.

And then from Former Labor MP Lindsay Tanner

“Why is it that it is only the terminally ill? Why shouldn’t it also be the severely disabled? Why not somebody with an incurable mental illness? Why not children who are terminally ill?”

And ……

Tanner’s point is that lines cannot be firm or fixed. Reinforcing his argument is that many euthanasia advocates, such as Peter Singer, actively promote its extension more widely. Tanner also dismissed the furphy about territory rights, saying it was absurd to let the Northern Territory, representing 1 per cent of the people, make such a decision affecting all Australians. Finally, he asked: What about the terminally ill who do not want to die? Good question. It was the question hammered by Burke and Andrews. Once the killing culture is established, the aged, sick and disabled will have to consider whether to put up their hands. They will feel obligated. Financial pressures, healthcare costs and expectations of family will assume new dimensions.

And the glaring contradiction

Yes, some people in pain want to die and it is hard to deny their claim. Yet there are many others glad to be alive today who would have volunteered for euthanasia if it had been legal five years ago. As Andrews said in 1996, a well person who is suicidal is offered counselling, but under euthanasia an ill person who is suicidal becomes an option for death.

And the final word of warning :

Brown’s bill will enable the territories, if they wish, to pass new euthanasia laws.

The full article can be found here

Christians should not be afraid to share the sufferings of Christ

During his recent visit to England, the Holy Father visited an old people’s home. His comments reported by the VIS should be of interest to all of us, especially as the Euthanasia debate rears it’s ugly head again.

Life is a unique gift, at every stage from conception until natural death, and it is God’s alone to give and to take. One may enjoy good health in old age; but equally Christians should not be afraid to share in the suffering of Christ, if God wills that we struggle with infirmity. My predecessor, the late Pope John Paul, suffered very publicly during the last years of his life. It was clear to all of us that he did so in union with the sufferings of our Saviour. His cheerfulness and forbearance as he faced his final days were a remarkable and moving example to all of us who have to carry the burden of advancing years.

The home chosen was run by the ‘Little Sisters of the Poor’ who are an order who work all over the world caring for the elderly and infirm. These sisters have a house in Northcote, Melbourne.  

And the next Theology at the Pub in Melbourne Sr Rosarii and Sr Rosemary from the Little Sisters of the Poor will be speaking on the topic Walking with the Aged, Growing Old with Dignity.
Meals from 6.30pm or just turn up for the talk at 7.30pm.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 324 other followers